Real Reviewer Support

RQL allows authors to request feedback from volunteer human reviewers after completing a full AI review.

This helps protect reviewer time and improves the quality of discussion by ensuring each manuscript has already passed through a structured preparation stage.

Start with Preliminary Assessment (free) See review options Browse Submitted Abstracts

How Real Reviewer support works

Step 1: Generate a Preliminary Assessment (free)

Upload your manuscript and receive an initial reviewer-style preview.

Step 2: Unlock the full AI review

Complete the full AI review to strengthen the document before involving human reviewers.

Step 3: Post title + abstract

Only the title and abstract become visible on the Reviewer Board. Your full PDF remains private.

Step 4: Receive volunteer interest

Volunteers can express interest, communicate privately, receive the manuscript, and submit feedback.

Why this workflow exists

Protects reviewer time
Improves manuscript readiness before human review
Reduces premature or low-quality review requests
Keeps the full document private until the author chooses to share it

Benefits

Human feedback after AI preparation
Private conversation threads
File exchange support
Review completion tracking
Feedback and reputation signals for both sides

Important note

Real Reviewer support is a volunteer matching and workflow system. It is not a replacement for journal peer review and does not guarantee acceptance.

Start with Preliminary Assessment (free)